Referencias bibliográficas

  1. Altman, L. K. (1996a). The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review. Part 1. Lancet, 347, 1382-1386.
  2. Altman, L. K. (1996b). The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review. Part 2. Lancet, 347, 1459-1463.
  3. Anon. (1999). Journal Citation Reports on CD-ROM. Science Edition. 1998. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.
  4. Borges, J. L. (1970). Labyrinths. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.
  5. Butler, D. (1999a). Internet may help bridge the gap. Nature, 397, 10-11.
  6. Butler, D. (1999b). The writing is on the web for science journals in print. Nature, 397, 195-200.
  7. Butler, D. (1999c). Reference quits journal over price rise as library faces cutbacks. Nature, 399, 623.
  8. Butler, D. (1999d). Publishers map out a way in response to free online archives. Nature, 402, 115.
  9. Butler, D. (2000). Biology back issues free as publishers walk HighWire. Nature, 404, 117.
  10. Carroll, L. (1982). The Complete Illustrated Works of Lewis Carroll. London: Chancelor Press.
  11. Coppel, R. L. (1996). Internet and the parasitologist: the what, where and why of the Web. Parasitology Today, 12, 85-87.
  12. Davidoff, F. (2000). Suppose there were no printers. Annals of Internal Medicine, 113, 57-58.
  13. Deering, C. M., Richardson, J. & Wares, C. G. (1995). Medical information: from Surgeon General to superhighway. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 89, 579-591.
  14. Delamothe, T., Müllner, M. & Smith, R. (1999). Pleasing both authors and readers; a combination of short print articles and longer electronic ones may help us do it. British Medical Journal, 318, 888.
  15. Gibbs, W. W. (1995). Lost science in the third world. Scientific American, 273 (Aug), 76-83.
  16. Ginsparg, P. (1996). Winners and Losers in the Global Research Village. URL: http://www.lanl.gov/blurb/pg96unesco.html
  17. Harnad, S. (1999). Online archives must serve authors as well as publishers. Nature, 401, 423.
  18. Koening, R. (2000). Publishers discuss European e-print site. Science, 287, 563.
  19. Laporte, R. E. (1997). Internet server with targeted access would cure information deficiency in developing countries. British Medical Journal, 314, 980.
  20. Laporte, R. E. & Hibbitts, B. (1996). We all want to change the world. British Medical Journal, 313, 1609-1611.
  21. Laporte, R. E., Marler, E., Akazawa, S. Sauer, F., Gamboa, C., Sentón, C., Glosser, C., Villaseñor, A. & Maclure, M. (1995). The death of biomedical journals. British Medical Journal, 310, 1387-1390.
  22. Lawrence, S. & Giles, C. L. (1998). Searching the World Wide Web. Science, 280, 98-100.
  23. Lawrence, S. & Giles, C. L. (1999). Accessibility of information on the Web. Science, 400, 107-109.
  24. Marshall, E. (1999). Journals launch private reference network. Science, 286, 1459.
  25. Marshal, E. (2000). Publish and perish in the Internet world. Science, 289, 223-224.
  26. McConnell, J. & Horton, R. (1999). Lancet electronic research archive in international health and eprint server. Lancet, 354, 2-3.
  27. Milstead, J. & Feldeman, S. (199a). Metadata: cataloging by any other name. Online, 23 (Jan), 24-30.
  28. Milstead, J. & Feldeman, S. (199b). Metadata projects and standards. Online, 23 (Jan), 31-41.
  29. Notess, G. R. (1998a). Tips for evaluating Web databases. Database, 21 (Apr), 69-72.
  30. Notess, G. R. (1998b). Toward more comprehensive web searching: single versus megasearching. Online, 22 (Mar), 73-76.
  31. Notess, G. R. (1999). Rising relevance in search engines. Online, 23 (May), 84-87.
  32. Pakenham-Walsh, N. & Smith, R. (1997). Meeting the information needs of health workers in developing countries; a new programme to coordinate and advise. British Medical Journal,314, 90.
  33. Proteous, J. (1997). Plugging into electronic journals. Nature, 389, 137-138.
  34. Schoonbaert, D. (1998a). Biomedical journals and the World Wide Web. Electronic Library, 16, 95-104.
  35. Schoonbaert, D. (1998b). ExtraMed. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, 63 (Suppl. 26), 82-98.
  36. Smith, R. (1998). The Internet and the developing world. British Medical Journal, 316, 1116.
  37. Smith, R. (1999a). What is publication? A continuum. British Medical Journal, 318, 142.
  38. Smith, R. (1999b). Another editor bites the dust; trust is needed to balance editorial independence and accountability. British Medical Journal, 319, 272.
  39. Tegenbos, J. & Nieuwenhuysen, P. (1997). My kingdom for an agent? Evaluation of Autonomy, an intelligent search agent for the Internet. Online and CDROM Review, 21, 139-148.
  40. Van De SompelL, H. & Lagoze, C. (2000). The Santa Fe Convention of the Open Archives Initiative. D-Lib Magazine, 6(2). URL: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/february00/vandesompel-oai/02vandespompel-oai.html
  41. Varmus, H. (1999a). E-BIOMED: a Proposal for Electronic Publications in the Biomedical Sciences [draft on 5 May 1999, and addendum on 20 June 1999]. URL: http://nih.gov/welcome/director/ebiomed/ebi.htm
  42. Varmus, H. (1999b). PubMed Central: an NIH-operated Site For Electronic Distribution of Life Sciences Research Reports. URL: http://nih.gov/welcome/director/ebiomed/ebi.htm
  43. Wadman, M. (1999). Libraries offer incentive for web-based rivals to "costly" journals. Nature, 398, 272.